Simulated apprenticeship for pre-service Filipino teachers

Main Article Content

Cesar Turqueza Medula

Abstract

The delivery of teacher education courses often for the most part deal with the visible parts of knowledge, the "know-what", which is often disconnected from the tacit knowledge, the "know-how", required in authentic teaching environments. It could be argued that would-be teachers do undergo practice teaching as part of their preparations and before becoming licensed professionals but said experience could be very brief. Said transitory period of practice-teaching may not be enough to internalize the range of skills and strategies that the new teachers need in facing the rigors of the real classroom setting. The purpose of this empirical study is to explore the impact of simSchool, a computer-based classroom simulator to the pedagogical style and expertise of pre-service Filipino teachers. The study utilized a quasi-experimental design. Purposefully, the study involved thirty (30) randomly selected practicum teacher education senior students. Two Likert-type survey instruments were used in the study and qualitative data were as well collected through teaching reflections and focus group discussions to supplement the quantitative data. For the statistical analyses, descriptive statistics were determined, Paired-Samples t Tests was used to determine pre-post differences within groups and Cohen’s d was used to determine effect sizes across measurement indices.  Findings of the study revealed that simschool enhanced the pedagogical style and proficiency of the pre-service teachers and interestingly could complement effectually the in-placed practicum course. These suggest the promising progressive impact of simSchool, if adapted, to the existing teacher education program.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

How to Cite
Medula, C. T. (2017). Simulated apprenticeship for pre-service Filipino teachers. World Journal on Educational Technology: Current Issues, 9(2), 89–97. https://doi.org/10.18844/wjet.v9i2.1350
Section
Articles
Author Biography

Cesar Turqueza Medula, Saint Mary's University, Center for Natural Sciences, 3700 Nueva Vizcaya, Philippines.

Associate Professor Center for Natural Sciences

References

Aldrich, C. (2004). Simulations and the future of learning: an innovative (and perhaps revolutionary) approach to e-learning. San Francisco: John Wiley & Sons.

Bialo, E. R. & Sivin-Kachala, J. (1996). The effectiveness of technology in schools: A summary of recent research. SLMQ, 25(1).

Chandra, V. & Lloyd, M. (2008), The methodological nettle: ICT and student achievement. British Journal of Educational Technology, 39: 1087–1098. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8535.2007.00790.x

Christensen, R., Knezek, G., Tyler-Wood, T., Fisser, P. & Gibson, D. (2011). simSchool: Research Outcomes from Simulated Classrooms. Retrieved at www.aace.org/conf/site/submission//uploads/SITE2012/paper_3049 on October 17, 2016.

Christensen, R., Knezek, G., Tyler-Wood, T., & Gibson, D. (2011).SimSchool: An Online Dynamic Simulator for Enhancing Teacher Preparation. International Journal of Learning Technologies.6(2), 201-220.

Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Earlbaum Associates.

Davis, N., Preston, C., & Sahln, I. (2008).Training teachers to use new technologies impacts multiple ecologies: Evidence from a national initiative. British Journal of Educational Technology, 39(4), 1–18.

DeVellis, R. (1991). Scale development. Newbury Park, NJ: Sage Publications.

Department for Children Schools and Families (DCSF), corp creator. (2009) Education and training statistics for the United Kingdom: 2009.

Foreman, J., Gee, J. P., Herz, J. C., Hinrichs, R., Prensky, M., & Sawyer, B. (2004). Game-based learning: How to delight and instruct in the 21st century. EDUCAUSE Review, 39(5), 50–66.

Gibson, David (2009). Digital simulations for improving education: Learning through artificial teaching environments. Hershey, PA.

Gibson, D., Christensen, R., Tyler-Wood, T. & Knezek, G. (2011). SimSchool: Enhancing Teacher Preparation through Simulated Classrooms. In M. Koehler & P. Mishra (Eds.), Proceedings of Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference 2011 (pp. 1504-1510). Chesapeake, VA: AACE. Retrieved October 28, 2016 from http://www.editlib.org/p/36508.

Kruse, S. and Gibson, D. (2011). Next Generation Learning Challenge: Simulating Teaching. EDUCAUSE Review Online. Retrieved at http://www.educause.edu/ero/article/next-generation-learning-challenge-simulating-teaching

Lambert, L., D. Walker, D. Zimmerman, J. Cooper, M. Lambert, M. Gardner, and P. Slack.(1995). The constructivist leader. New York: Teachers College Press.

Lave, J., and E. Wenger. 1991. Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge: Cambridge

University Press.

Lawless, K. A., & Pellegrino, J. W. (2007). Professional Development in Integrating Technology Into teaching and Learning: Knowns, Unknowns, and Ways to Pursue Better Questions and Answers. Review of Educational Research,77(4), 575. National Science Foundation. 2003. Teacher professional continuum program solicitation. NSF 03-534. Retrieved at http://www.nsf.gov/pubs/2003/nsf03534/nsf03534.htm on September 18, 2016.

Prensky, M. (2001).Digital game-based learning. New York: McGraw-Hill.

Riedel, E. (2000). Teacher beliefs & preparation survey. University of Minnesota: Center for applied research and educational improvement.

Russell, M., Bebell, D., O’Dwyer, L. & O’Connor, K. (2003). Examining teacher technology use: Implications for preservice and in-service teacher preparation. Journal of Teacher Education, 54(4), 297-310.

Shaffer, David Williamson (2005). Epistemic Games. Innovate: Journal of Online Education, 1(6), Available at: http://nsuworks.nova.edu/innovate/vol1/iss6/2.