Turkish teachers’ and students’ perceptions towards computer assisted testing in comparison with Spanish teachers’ and students’ perceptions

Main Article Content

Abstract

There are different opinions about using technology in assessment field of education regarding computer assisted assessments. People have some concerns such as its application, reliability and so on. It seems that those concerns may decrease with the developing technology in the following years since computer-based testing programs are gradually getting better in terms of reliability and utility.  This research aims to determine Turkish teachers’ and students’ perceptions towards computer assisted testing comparing the results with Spanish students’ and teachers’ perceptions. In this study, testing and assessment are used interchangeably even though some researchers accept these terms separately. The result of this study is crucial for educators in Turkey because computer-assisted assessment is being tried to be applied in Turkish schools. It is crucial to be aware of educators and students’ perceptions towards it.

Keywords: computer assisted testing, Spanish, Turkish, teachers, students.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

How to Cite
Turkish teachers’ and students’ perceptions towards computer assisted testing in comparison with Spanish teachers’ and students’ perceptions. (2015). World Journal on Educational Technology: Current Issues, 7(2), 99–106. https://doi.org/10.18844/wjet.v7i2.42
Section
Articles

References

Bloom, B. (1956). Taxonomy of Educational Objectives, Boston: Allyn and Bacon

Callella, T. (2007). The Learning Works: More Prefixes and Suffixes, Grades 4-8: Teaching Vocabulary to Improve Reading Comprehension, Creative Teaching Press

Cummins, J. (2002). Making a difference in the lives of bilingual-bicultural learners.

Ebbers, S. M. (2004). Vocabulary through morphemes: Suffixes, prefixes, and roots for intermediate grades. Longmont, CO: Sopris West.

Goeke, Jennifer L. (2008). Explicit Instruction: A Framework for Meaningful Direct Teaching, page 11.

Hubbard, L. Ron (1972). Learning How to Learn, p. 101; Basic Study Manual Journal, 16(1), 33-42.75

Onish, L. (2010). Vocabulary Packets: Prefixes & Suffixes: Ready-to-Go Learning Packets That Teach 50 Key Prefixes and Suffixes and Help Students Unlock the Meaning of Dozens and Dozens of Must-Know Vocabulary Words.

Rasinski, T. V., Padak, N., Newton, R. M., & Newton, E. (2008). Greek & Latin roots: Keys to building vocabulary. Shell Education.

Rippel, Marie (2012). All About Spelling and All About Reading, Eeagle River, WI

Short, D., & Echevarria, J. (2004). Teacher skills to support English language learners. Educational Leadership, 62(4), 8-13.

Turner, H., & Williams, R. L. (2007). Vocabulary development and perfomance of multiple-choice exams in large entry-level courses. Journal of College Reading and Learning, 37(2), 64-81

Vance, T. J. (1990). Instant vocabulary through prefixes and suffixes. Kodansha Amer Inc.

Wallace, C. (2008). Vocabulary: The Key to Teaching English Language Learners to Read. Education Digest: Essential Readings Condensed for Quick Review, 73(9), 36-39.

Wulff, Henrik, MD (2004). The language of medicine, JRSM Med. 2004 April, 97(4), 187-188.